DuckDuckGo sees user uptick following Google plans for an AI search box

Showing all posts about trends

DuckDuckGo sees user uptick following Google plans for an AI search box

4 June 2026

Search engine DuckDuckGo has experienced a noticeable surge in users in recent weeks, says Rebecca Bellan, writing for TechCrunch.

Many of these new arrivals are concerned about Google’s proposals to significantly change its search experience, through the use of AI, something I think is being called AI Mode.

DuckDuckGo said U.S. app installs went up 18.1% week-over-week on average during the May 20 to May 25 period, compared to May 13 to May 18. The company said that growth was sustained for six consecutive days and peaked at 30.5% on May 25. On iOS, the rate of install is even higher, with week-over-week growth hitting a 33% average, peaking at 69.9%.

In addition to its regular search engine, DuckDuckGo also offers a completely AI-free search option.

Dickover: a name for annoying website call-to-action popups

1 June 2026

John Gruber, writing at Daring Fireball:

You know what a dickover is, even if you didn’t know what to call it (until now). If you use the Internet, you encounter them every day. They’re popovers, but dickheaded. The web is absolutely lousy with them, and mobile apps present them too, with increasing frequency.

I’ve written before about my frustration with these popup box thingies, that present on the screen, before you even know what website you’re on. But dickovers — is there a way we can ratify this as the official name for them? — have been around for a long time, decades by now.

But it makes me wonder: is the blogosphere to blame for their prevalence today?

Popup boxes, in the form of a separate browser window, that usually carried advertising of some sort, were a scourge of the early web. Eventually, browsers allowed users to block them. But the call-to-action popups that followed, are something else. Not so easy to block out.

They began appearing on some of the blogs I read regularly, usually as a means to goad readers into signing up to a newsletter. In response, I’d ceased reading the blog if an RSS feed wasn’t available.

Maybe this is why I remain averse to newsletters. I’m subscribed to maybe half a dozen, tops. Tell me though call-to-action popups, AKA dickovers, didn’t escape from the old/early blogosphere, only to run rampant like a virus, infecting a large, and growing, number of websites?

RELATED CONTENT

language, technology, trends

AI: you cannot live with it, you cannot live without it

1 June 2026

Daniel Jalkut:

My take on AI is, essentially, everybody who’s against it is too against it and everybody who’s for it is too for it.

From where I sit, somewhere in the middle of this, that’s the way it looks.

The abundance of available information is why you read less books

30 May 2026

Arnold King, writing at In My Tribe;

I now read many fewer books than I did ten years ago. This not because of “the phones.” It is not because I have lost my intellectual mojo. It is because alternative sources of information have become more compelling.

Essays, streaming video, podcasts, and (like it or not) social media, are among the alternative sources King refers to, and not even works of fiction are immune.

In short, there’s a lot more information in the world today, compared to even twenty-five years ago, and books are no longer the only way to consume this knowledge.

RELATED CONTENT

books, reading, technology, trends

British study finds individuals mostly responsible for ill health in later life

30 May 2026

Amelia Hill, writing for The Guardian:

Individuals bear at least 80% of the responsibility for their ill health in old age, according to a report aimed at challenging the belief that physical decline is either inevitable or primarily the responsibility of the state.

This finding is from the Oxford Longevity Project, conducted in the United Kingdom.

Eighty-percent sounds high to me, considering people are not always in control of the circumstances they might find themselves in.

RELATED CONTENT

health, science, trends

Psychological distress in parents possibly behind low Australian birth rates, not smartphones

22 May 2026

Sixty percent of Australian parents reported experiencing psychological distress, according to the results of the Parenting Today survey, conducted late last year by the Parenting Research Centre.

It has been suggested the impact on the mental health of parents in Australia is contributing to current record low birth rates here.

Psychological distress and poor mental health, are not however the only factors dragging down births both in Australia, and elsewhere in the world. Cost of living pressures and expensive housing are also playing a part. As is, possibly, smartphone usage.

Earlier this week Tyler Cowen, at Marginal Revolution, posted birth rate data from ten countries which generally show a prolonged, and clear, decline in birth rates across the twentieth century.

An uptick is apparent in some nations during the baby-boom, which followed World War II, through to the 1960’s. The overall downward trend in birth rates obviously predate smartphones, and possibly even expensive housing, though.

New Google AI powered search box poses a threat to website traffic

21 May 2026

The AI generated result summaries on Google searches, that we’ve become accustomed to recently, sound like they will be a thing of the past when a new search… experience is rolled out shortly.

Because your curiosity doesn’t always fit into keywords, we’re also introducing the biggest upgrade to our Search box in over 25 years — now completely reimagined with AI. This intelligent Search box puts our most powerful AI tools right at your fingertips, making it easier to ask your questions.

Blame the upgrade — the first in a quarter of century — on our boundless curiosity then.

One can only imagine the impact the new search results will have on website traffic. Particularly if links to the sources of information used to compile search results are not shown.

Emma Roth, writing for The Verge, notes that people will still be able to see “traditional” search results by clicking/pressing on the “web” tab on the search page.

I wonder how many people will select that option, as my guess is the majority of searchers will probably be satisfied with the default AI generated results.

Falling birth rates and smartphones: a technology as malevolent as AI?

19 May 2026

Om Gupta, writing for India Today:

The researchers believe smartphones fundamentally changed how young people interact with each other. More time shifted online, while face-to-face socialising declined. According to the study, this reduction in in-person interaction may have contributed to lower fertility rates. The pattern appears to extend beyond just the US and UK. Financial Times analysis found that birth rates in several countries began falling sharply around the same time smartphones became widely adopted.

Gupta cites research published a few days ago by the Financial Times (paywalled).

I doubt the blame for the reported decline in birth rates globally can be placed wholly at the feet of smartphones, but it’s not unreasonable to believe they are playing some role.

It’s hardly empirical proof, but increasingly I need to sidestep people walking along the footpath who are focused only on their smartphone, almost oblivious to the presence of anyone else. If people can’t go without phones during a short walk from one place to another, when are they ever supposed to focus on other things, let alone meeting, and interacting with others, face-to-face?

I’m a smartphone user the same as everyone else, and couldn’t begin to imagine managing without one. But if indeed it is the case that smartphones are contributing — at least partly — to falling birth rates, shouldn’t we be alarmed?

In recent weeks we have been witnessing a growing, at times hostile, backlash against AI technologies. People are angry and fearful. They are concerned by the threat AI poses to their livelihoods. Of the three epoch-defining shifts in technology — to use the words of John Gruber — in recent decades, being the web, smartphones, and AI, it is the last, AI, that is seen as malevolent.

Or the more malevolent.

But if birth rates are falling across the world, and smartphone usage has something to do with that, can we continue to regard these devices as anything less than pernicious?

But pointing the finger of blame at smartphones is the easy part. What to do about the problem, if that’s even how the situation can be described, is far from straightforward.

It somewhat feels like we are painting ourselves into a corner, if we haven’t already, with, really all three of these epoch-defining shifts in technology.

Only films with human actors, writers, will be eligible for Oscar nomination

15 May 2026

The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS), the organisation that presents the Oscar awards, recently clarified their rules regarding the use of AI in films they will accept nominations for.

According to rule two, regarding eligibility, specifically clause seven, there are instance where AI, and “other digital tools” (things like visual effects, computer-generated imagery, and green screen, I expect) can be used by filmmakers (PDF), to a degree :

With regard to Generative Artificial Intelligence and other digital tools used in the making of the film, the tools neither help nor harm the chances of achieving a nomination. The Academy and each branch will judge the achievement, taking into account the degree to which a human was at the heart of the creative authorship when choosing which movie to award. If questions arise regarding the aforementioned use of Generative Artificial Intelligence, the Academy reserves the right to request more information about the nature of the use and human authorship.

Rule six, clause one, in regards to the acting awards, makes clear that only films with human actors can be nominated:

Only roles credited in the film’s legal billing and demonstrably performed by humans with their consent will be considered eligible.

Rule twenty-four, clause two, spells out eligibility for writing (screenplays, etc) Oscars:

To be eligible in either Writing category, an explicit screenwriting credit must be present in the film’s legal billing and the screenplay must be human-authored.

That covers the Oscars, for now, but raises the question: will there eventually be a separate set of “night of night” awards — that are nothing to do with the AMPAS/Oscars — for films that are wholly, or largely, made using AI technologies. My guess is it’s bound to happen sooner or later.

Bricks and mortar bookshops making a comeback in the United States

30 April 2026

Andy Hunter, CEO and founder of indie bookseller Bookshop.org, talking recently with Shannon Cudd of Fast Company:

“People are really galvanizing around bookstores as a force for good in our culture,” he says. “You see that in the fact that there are about 70% more bookstores now than there were six years ago in the United States. After 20 years of declining numbers, they’re coming roaring back.”

This can only be a good thing.

RELATED CONTENT

America, books, bookshops, trends

« older posts

newer posts »