Those thinking AI will reduce their workloads might be mistaken

Showing all posts about trends

Those thinking AI will reduce their workloads might be mistaken

11 February 2026

Aruna Ranganathan and Xingqi Maggie Ye, writing for Harvard Business Review:

In our in-progress research, we discovered that AI tools didn’t reduce work, they consistently intensified it. In an eight-month study of how generative AI changed work habits at a U.S.-based technology company with about 200 employees, we found that employees worked at a faster pace, took on a broader scope of tasks, and extended work into more hours of the day, often without being asked to do so.

Earlier generations of our families were probably told computers would bring about two-day work weeks. In reality all computers did was free up time to do yet more work.

AI is tracking that way. It might have seen off some aspects of our work, only to allow us to take on other things. But these are early days, and it could be there will be little AI cannot do. Eventually.

Statcounter eliminates bot visits from their web analytics

10 February 2026

Jonathan Morton, at Statcounter:

We have seen a significant rise in bot traffic to websites in recent months. These bots are adopting new methods to avoid detection and when they flood your stats with fake visits, they can make it very difficult to get an accurate view of the real visitors on your website.

I’ve been using Statcounter for web analytics at disassociated since 2007.

While such services have never been completely accurate, and people are increasingly blocking trackers, I still like to have a look at what happens here traffic-wise each morning. It’s been refreshing these last few days to view visit activity less the sometimes relentless bot surges.

Bots, which are usually seeking content to train AI agents, are something I tolerate. I’m no fan, but I’m not sure I can really block them effectively.

What’s annoyed me though is the way they skew visitor numbers. If their activity were invisible, which I think the majority are (according to the raw server data I have access to), I wouldn’t so much mind.

I, for one, welcome our new AI agent employer overlords

7 February 2026

AI agents might be smart enough to tell us how to, say, mow the lawn. But an AI agent cannot actually mow a lawn itself. Unless, perhaps, the lawn-mower in question is a smart machine, that an AI agent might be able to control.

Otherwise, when it comes to doing tasks that are hands-on, AI agents are going to need to the help of humans. Enter then RentAHuman, an online work marketplace, where AI agents can advertise jobs they need a person to do on their behalf.

I’m assuming the jobs posted on RentAHuman are real (though I haven’t verified this, nor taken on any work myself), but some of the budgets — with some agents apparently offering one-hundred-and-fifty dollars an hour — don’t look half bad.

This seems a lot like gig-economy type work, so if you want to take a break from being, say, an Uber driver, RentAHuman might be for you. And with websites such as RentAHuman, could we be looking at the future — the medium term future at least — of work?

Mozilla is forming a ‘rebel alliance’ to take on the AI heavyweights

6 February 2026

Mozilla, developer of web browser Firefox, and email app Thunderbird, among other things, is forming an AI “rebel alliance” to counter the industry’s big players, writes Ashley Capoot, at CNBC:

Surman is building what he’s described as “a rebel alliance of sorts,” using a phrase that’s long been part of Mozilla’s lexicon. In this case, the alliance is a loose network of tech startups, developers and public interest technologists committed to making AI more open and trustworthy and to checking the power of industry heavyweights like OpenAI and Anthropic.

The industry heavyweights the alliance is up against are well entrenched. Some sort of counterbalance however can’t be a bad thing.

Substack reportedly asking Australian users to verify their age

2 February 2026

According to a Reddit thread, that was re-posted at Marginal Revolution, the online publishing platform is requesting users in Australia submit to an age verification process.

Substack, as of the time I type, is not on the list of websites, or services, that Australians under the age of sixteen cannot access, so I’m not sure why Substack would be doing this. If indeed they are.

On a visit to Substack, again, as of the time I write this, I was able to access, and move around the site without hindrance. I was not logged in, but was using an Australian ISP.

Evidently some people are having difficulty though. Possibly age verification only applies to people in Australia who are logging in to gain access. I might try doing this another time.

But Substack is a platform, and who knows, may one day be added to the banned list. This is precisely why online writers should be publishing from their own, independent website, and not a platform.

And this is before addressing the concerns many people have with Substack in the first place.

Coming soon to Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp: subscription content

31 January 2026

Aisha Malik, writing for TechCrunch:

The launch of additional subscriptions will allow Meta to generate more revenue; however, many users may be deterred by subscription fatigue. With so many paid services competing for monthly spending, Meta will have to offer a compelling product to get users to sign up for yet another subscription.

Meta plans to trial subscriptions on Facebook (FB), Instagram (IG), and WhatsApp. I’m pleased I’ve managed to so far avoid signing up to WhatsApp, and only make minimal use of Facebook.

I check in a little on IG though, so am expecting to see sign up prompts for a subscription service of some sort, should they be rolled out. I can’t see myself taking up the offer though.

No matter how compelling the product might be. But what would it take to make a subscription product available through FB, IG, or WhatsApp, compelling enough to pay for in the first place?

Considering such content may already be accessible through another channel, either for free, or that someone is already paying to see. Does Meta not earn enough advertising revenue as it is?

In the meantime, I nominate “subscription-fatigue” as word of the year for 2026.

RELATED CONTENT

social media, technology, trends

Influencers, content creators, taking centre court at Australian Open

27 January 2026

Marnie Vinell, writing for the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC):

Emily Wade, 28, says she is a genuine fan who is finding it personally frustrating to see the influx of influencers take up seats at marquee matches when others who would genuinely appreciate being there for the tennis are finding it increasingly inaccessible through overcrowding and higher ticket prices.

Ticket buying fans report waiting hours, in the heat, to watch the tennis matches, and claim social media influencers are being given priority access.

The Australian Open (AO) sells itself. As long as tennis fans know the world’s top players are going to be in Melbourne in January, they’ll show up and buy tickets.

No advertising required, let alone influencers.

But the show no longer seems to be about the fans, it’s about putting social media content creators with large followings, centre court. You no longer go to see games, you go for an experience. One which may not include a whole lot of actual tennis.

But it’s not all beer and skittles for the influencers however. They have to sing for their supper, or, presumably, risk not being invited back:

But one popular TikTok influencer, who talked to the ABC on the condition of anonymity, said they were surprised at the level of pressure placed on influencers to be creating content by organisers.

“I think it was 20 posts [across the tournament] to even be allowed into the AO creator lounge,” they said. The creator lounge is a designated section within Tennis HQ, where creators can film, edit and work.

Influencers under pressure? I’d have thought they’d be the ones calling the shots, especially those with millions of followers. “If you want to me to show up to some tournament I have no real interest in, and promote it, we’re doing things my way.”

It sounds like influencers, even the established ones, don’t have a great deal of leverage after all.

RELATED CONTENT

Australia, social media, sport, trends

Blogs are Back: easily follow website and blog RSS feeds with one-click

26 January 2026

Subscribing to RSS feeds is my preferred option for following websites, but for people unfamiliar with the really simple syndication system, doing so can be daunting.

I’ve long thought subscribing to a website needs to be as easy as following someone on a social network. Tap the follow button to follow, and you’re following.

But following a RSS feed — doubtless something anyone reading this post could do in their sleep — isn’t necessarily straightforward. People first require a suitable RSS reader, again, something that’s easy when you know how. Then they need to go about the process of obtaining the URL of the RSS feed they wish to subscribe to.

But there’s more than one click involved in this process. While it’s easy as pie for some of us, I can see why many people decide not to bother, or simply stay on the socials instead.

Blogs are Back, created by Travis Van Nimwegen, an American software engineer, might be a solution to the one-click subscribe conundrum. Blogs are Back is two things: a directory of personal websites and blogs, and a simple way of following the RSS feeds of listed blogs.

Click the follow button of a website of your choosing, and that’s it.

Posts from any website a Blogs are Back user subscribes to will be visible in the integrated RSS reader. There’s also an option to submit a blog if it’s not already in the directory, and the more websites present, the better.

I’m not sure if an ubiquitous app/website, allowing people who know nothing at all about RSS, to follow RSS feeds with ease, will emerge — it seems to me RSS is mostly for those publishing their own RSS feeds — but this is certainly a step in the right direction.

RELATED CONTENT

blogs, RSS, technology, trends

OpenAI rolling out age prediction system, but how accurate is it?

24 January 2026

Age prediction will soon apply to ChatGPT consumer plans. The system is said to take a number of factors into consideration when trying to figure out an account holder’s age.

Should someone find themselves erroneously classified as being under the age of eighteen, they will need to submit a selfie (photo of themselves) in an attempt to rectify matters:

Users who are incorrectly placed in the under-18 experience will always have a fast, simple way to confirm their age and restore their full access with a selfie through Persona, a secure identity-verification service.

Age prediction based on selfies is not quite an exacting science though. What then will an inconclusive prediction mean? That people need to offer photo identification — say a passport or drivers licence — to complete the age “prediction” process?

Threads surges ahead of X/Twitter among mobile device users

24 January 2026

Sarah Perez writing for TechCrunch:

A report from market intelligence firm Similarweb suggests that Meta’s Threads is now seeing more daily usage than Elon Musk’s X on mobile devices. While X still dominates Threads on the web, the Threads mobile app for iOS and Android has continued to see an increase in daily active users over the past several months.

This seems like a case of I have good news, I have bad news.

My use of Threads is limited, with X next to non-existent at present. But if the quality of discourse on X is bad, Threads is hardly any better.

I can already see Thread’s users “celebrating” the news, with posts that read exactly like this: “I have great news”. That’s it. Nothing more. No additional information or context.

After all, why let information get in the way of a good Threads’ post?

« older posts