After 25 years we still don’t know what the web is, what it could be

Showing all posts tagged: technology

After 25 years we still don’t know what the web is, what it could be

18 April 2025

Here’s some web history trivia for you: it’s been twenty-five years since A Dao of Web Design was published at A List Apart (ALA). Written by Australian product developer, and Web Directions co-founder John Allsopp, the article explored how the web, still seen then as an online variation of print, could find its own path, and evolve into something entirely different.

Reflecting on his ALA article earlier this week, John made the following comment:

The Web is its own thing — but we’ve still yet to really discover what that is. Don’t ask me, I don’t know what that is either. But a quarter of a century on I’m still just as interested in discovering what that is.

I think what we can say now though, is the web is no longer a child of print.

For additional historical trivia, see this article I wrote for the Sydney Morning Herald/The Age, about John and Westciv, a company he established with Maxine Sherrin. Westciv developed tools to assist web designers create compliant CSS, and web pages.

That was twenty-years ago — yes, mind blown — and was one of several articles I wrote for print publications, before becoming more focused on writing online. And while talking of ALA, it sadly appears only to be publishing sporadically nowadays.

Meta seeks to improve cinema experience by encouraging smartphone use

15 April 2025

After unleashing their content polluting algorithms onto our social media feeds, allowing the display of stuff (sorry, content is not the right word in this context) from people we don’t follow, far less even heard of, Facebook owner Meta wants to interfere with the film watching experience.

Technology called Movie Mate, will allow people to “second screen” during a film, that is, watch a feature on the big screen, while accessing related “exclusive content” on their smartphones. As if second screening, whereby people don’t put their phones down at the cinema, isn’t already a big enough problem, and Meta wants to encourage the practise.

But let’s talk about second screening for a minute. I don’t have a problem with what’s sometimes referred to as content grazing, while watching a movie. In fact, I find it quite relaxing. I might stream a movie I’m familiar with, and lookup other things on my phone. Since I know what’s going to happen in the story, I can multitask a bit, without worrying about missing anything important.

But this is at home, not in a movie theatre, being the only place Movie Mate will be available. And sure, access to story related trivia, director’s commentaries, and deleted scenes is fun, but hardly while watching the film at the same time. Won’t that be distracting, especially for first-time viewers? Isn’t there the risk they’ll miss something important?

It makes me wonder what the intent of second screen technology really is.

From Meta’s point of view though, it’s pretty simple. They like to take something sensible and straightforward, say a social media feed featuring only content people want to see, and muddy it up. From a film producer’s perspective though? That’s a little trickier to fathom. I don’t see how presenting extra-features content, simultaneously, during the film is screening, is meant to be useful.

For repeat viewings, and at home, of course. But not in a theatre full of people who want see a film, not a sea of phone screens. The second screen technology will be trailed in American cinemas during limited run re-screenings of 2022 horror title M3GAN, in a few weeks. Ok, a lot of people have already seen M3GAN, so just maybe checking out extra features in this fashion won’t be a problem.

But making only-for-use-in-cinema second screen tech available for first-time releases, premieres even? Now there’s a horror story in the making.

RELATED CONTENT

film, film production, technology

Thomas Mitchell: when your book is used to train AI platforms without permission

14 April 2025

American tech company Meta has been using the works of Australian authors — and no doubt many writers worldwide — to train its AI platforms. This happens, apparently, without consultation with the authors, and certainly — to date — without any payment. Australian author Thomas Mitchell (Instagram link), of Today I F****d Up fame, writes first-hand about the experience:

I have very little in common with Australian author Tim Winton. He has written many books, and I have written one. His titles are bestsellers; my book was mainly purchased by friends and family. He loves the ocean, whereas I am happier on land. Despite our differences, it turns out both Tim Winton and I are part of the same unfortunate club: Australian authors being ripped off by Meta.

Meta using the work of Australian authors to train AI platforms

7 April 2025

Two years ago it was ChatGPT being trained with books written by Australian authors, without their knowledge or permission. Now Facebook owner Meta is doing the same thing: using the works of local writers without permission or royalty.

A number of Australian authors, including Sophie Cunningham, Hannah Kent, Tim Winton, Helen Garner, and Alexis Wright, using a tool developed by The Atlantic, have found their work has been added to LibGen, a database Meta is using to “train” its generative AI platform.

The company claims their use of the novels constitutes fair use, as, apparently, only “limited” amounts of copyright material is being used.

If the Meta AI technology in question is what I saw on Instagram a day or two ago, on the search tab, then it’s not much to write home about. I typed my name in to see what would happen, something that appeared to stump the AI platform.

Instead of saying something about me, someone’s who been online here for over twenty-five years — how could Meta’s AI technology possibly not know about that? — it returned a spiel about an English football player called Frank, who has the same surname as I do.

If the writing of some of Australia’s best authors can’t help the technology figure out what day of the week it is, just how useful is this AI platform going to be?

The fifty best Microsoft products? This is not an April fool

3 April 2025

I wondered if this was an April’s fool joke. A list of the fifty best things Microsoft (MS) ever made, compiled by The Verge.

Among inclusions is Clippy, a well intentioned though sometimes annoying paperclip-like assistant, that shipped with Office 97. There’s also Slate Magazine, originally a MS publication. Solitaire is an obvious highlight. But no mention of NotePad. Or Windows NT4? This has to be an April fool’s prank.

RELATED CONTENT

humour, technology

Don’t blame Apple for the failure of Apple Intelligence, blame AI

31 March 2025

Allison Morrow, writing for CNN:

Apple is not the laggard in AI. AI is the laggard in AI.

Here is a technology that’s still in the early days of development, has been hyped to the hilt, and heaped with lofty expectations. We’d call it vapour-ware if it didn’t actually exist. There’s some very smart people working at Apple, but it seems surprising they’d go promising the earth without better understanding what they were dealing with.

AI scraper bots like your website content, you should feel grateful

28 March 2025

Herman Martinus, creator of the Bear Blogging platform:

Bear is hit daily by bot networks requesting tens of thousands of pages in short time periods, and while I now have systems in place to prevent it actually taking down the server, when it started happening a few months ago it certainly had an impact on performance.

I check my website stats every morning, and high hopes that something I wrote might have gone viral, wanes almost immediately when I realise AI scraper bots have been at it again.

I considered trying to block the data scrapers, but read that such methods are often ignored. I suppose I should feel faltered that developers of AI bots think the content published here is worthy of training one of their LLMs. There seems little else I can really do.

Auto generated Instagram comments, the smallest biggest AI threat

26 March 2025

Meta has been trailing an AI assistant that will help Instagram (IG) users compose comments for photos and video posted by their friends, says Aisha Malik, writing for TechCrunch:

Users who have access to the test feature will see a pencil icon next to the text bar under a post that they can tap to start accessing Meta AI, according to a video posted by Manzano. From there, Meta AI will analyze the photo before generating three suggestions for comments.

Awesome. Now we don’t even need to think up a comment to write about a friend’s photo on IG. What next then? AI is going to turning us all into beings incapable of original thought.

Man posts videos of himself propositioning Sydney women to his socials

26 March 2025

An unnamed American “content creator” recently asked a number of women — quite persistently at times — to go on dates with him, in and around the eastern suburbs of Sydney, NSW. He was however — unbeknown to the women in question — filming the interactions with smart-glasses, and later posting them to his social media accounts.

At least one woman asked him to take down a post she featured in, but he refused to comply. She also asked Instagram owner Meta to remove the footage, but the request was ignored. The women then spoke to NSW Police, who told her there was nothing they could do — even though NSW state surveillance laws were breached — as the man has since left Australia.

Here is another quagmire we’re walking into. Up until now it has been relatively apparent if a face-to-face interaction is being recorded in public. At the very least, a smartphone is being pointed at us.

But by way of a pair of glasses, with a camera that may not be easy to detect, is another matter. It might be against the law, in some states anyway, but if the wrong-doer is outside the country, it seems people out and about in public might have no legal recourse if the law has been broken.

RELATED CONTENT

crime, social media, technology, trends

Do not buy a new computer: Microsoft should make a Windows 11 variant that works on old computers

24 March 2025

I’m no longer (thankfully) in the Windows fold, so I’m not one-hundred percent sure, but it seems like some older computers might not be able to run Microsoft’s (MS) most recent operating system (OS), Windows 11. Accordingly, owners of such devices seem intent to hold onto their existing machines, and stay on Windows 10, at the same time.

After all, do you really need to buy a new computer? If their present device is sufficient, why bother replacing it? That’s not the way MS sees things though. They want everyone to migrate to Win 11, come what may. Your existing computer is not up to running Win 11? No problem, simply buy a new device, and see if you can get a trade-in on the old one.

This is a suggestion MS has emailed to some Win 10 users recently. Evidently MS is unaware of the cost of living pressures some people are facing. And what sort of trade-in deal does MS think anyone will get from a device that cannot run Win 11, anyway? What an absurd notion: buy a new computer so you can upgrade to MS’s new OS.

People can continue using Win 10 on their computers for as long as they want, but will eventually stop receiving security updates. And running Win 10 without crucial updates would not be wise. The only safe way forward is to try another OS, such as Linux, but that’s not an option for everyone.

It’s doable of course, but there is something of a learning curve involved. I think the ball is in MS’s court though. They could do more to help people on older machines migrate to Win 11. One suggestion is to roll out a “light weight” version of Win 11 for those unable to change computers. This light version of Win 11 wouldn’t of course have the same capabilities as the full version, but for some people that might be a small price to pay.

I’m thinking a little of XFCE, the Linux Mint OS variant, designed to run on “low-end” personal computers. It could hardly be an onerous task for a company with the resources MS has at its disposal. Don’t make people buy a computer that suits your OS Microsoft: make an OS that suits the computers people already have.

RELATED CONTENT

security, software, technology

« older posts

newer posts »